Frequently Asked Questions

Clear filters
  1. Auditors used to employ valuers. Has PSAA considered allowing councils to pay more for specific requirements (valuers) within the contract?

    We recognise that as part of the drive to improve audit quality the FRC is encouraging use of experts such as valuers, and audit firms can claim additional fees for appropriate use via the fee variations process.

  2. Can an opted-in body opt out at a later date?

    No, acceptance of PSAA’s invitation to opt in means that the body is opted in for the duration of the compulsory appointing period (typically set at five years, so from either 2018/19 or 2023/24).

    The only exception is where the body ceases to exist or the body ceases to fall within the classes of authorities for which PSAA is the appointing person.

  3. Can eligible local government or police bodies still opt into the scheme for an appointing period if it did not accept the invitation to join the scheme, or if it is unsuccessful in establishing local arrangements?

    An eligible body that did not accept the opt-in invitation for an appointing period may request to opt in during the appointing period only:

    • for the audits 2023/24 to 2027/28, that is on or after 1 April 2023

    PSAA must consider a request as the appointing person in accordance with the Regulations. It must agree to the request unless it has reasonable grounds for refusing it and notify the eligible body within four weeks of its decision with an explanation if the request is refused.

    Where the request is accepted, the body will become an opted-in body for the remainder of the appointing period on the date the notice is received by PSAA.

    PSAA may recover from the opted-in body its reasonable costs for making arrangements to appoint a local auditor in these circumstances.

  4. Can you provide a breakdown of the fees on the fee variation statement?

    The statement provides a breakdown of the individual fee variation elements we have considered and are minded to approve.

  5. Do audited bodies act as evaluators for the procurements or is it just PSAA staff?

    For both the 2017 and 2022 procurements, the quality evaluation of tender responses was independently observed by the LGA having put in place assurance to guarantee commercial confidentiality in the process.

  6. Does PSAA adjust the audit fee proposals submitted by firms for disclaimed audits or approve the fees as submitted?

    We review and determine firms’ audit fee proposals in accordance with 17(2) of the Local Audit (Appointing Person) Regulations. Our work includes looking in detail at the fee variations submitted to assess whether we consider them to be appropriate. When making determinations we consider each individual fee variation and compare similar fee variations across all audit firms. Where appropriate we make adjustments having followed our process

    For disclaimed audit opinions, we have reviewed each firm’s audit procedures to issue them. The firms were statutorily obliged to take into account the Local Audit Reset and Recovery Implementation Guidance (LARRIGs) issued in September 2024 by the National Audit Office and endorsed by the Financial Reporting Council, and Ministerial statements had stated that they would be paid for work that they did in good faith to deliver what was needed to meet the requirements of the Code of Audit Practice. 

  7. Does PSAA require its contracted audit firms to demonstrate how they will minimise environmental impact/address climate change issues?

    PSAA’s audit services contracts covering the audits from 2018/19 to 2022/23 include a clause in relation to ‘Co-operation with PSAA on environmental issues’. This states that “Throughout the Contract the Supplier shall co-operate with PSAA in seeking reasonable and practical ways to improve the sustainability of the delivery of the Services”. There is a requirement for our contracted firms to consider environmental issues.

    Our contracts covering the audits from 2023/24 to 2027/28 require auditors to co-operate with us in seeking reasonable and practical ways to improve the sustainability of the delivery of the Services.

  8. Does the appointing person scheme cover the audit of an authority’s pension fund where it is the administrative body responsible for preparing the pension fund accounts?

    Pension funds are not separate legal entities from their administering local authority for audit, and are therefore not listed as relevant authorities in schedule 2 of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014.

    The auditor appointment to an opted-in local authority includes the audit of the pension fund where the authority is the administering body. The pension fund audit is subject to a separate engagement and scale audit fee, but the auditor appointment covers both the local authority and the pension fund.

  9. Does the appointing person take on all Auditor Panel roles and therefore mitigate the need for there to be one in each individual authority?

    Opting into the appointing person scheme removes the need for a body to set up an independent Auditor Panel. The detailed requirements for this are set out in the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014 and the Local Audit (Appointing Person) Regulations 2015.

  10. For a disclaimed audit, is the scale fee paid in addition to the fee variation?

    For bodies with only VFM arrangements-related fees and the fees for issuing a disclaimer opinion, there will be no separate scale fee charge. 

    For all other fee variations this will depend on the circumstances of each body.  Please note that for a disclaimed audit we will assess separately any fees in relation to audit work in response to elector queries and objections.