Fee variations

  1. I have not agreed some of the proposed fees in the statement – why have you approved them?

    We expect auditors to discuss proposed fee variations with bodies at the earliest opportunity. Wherever possible, the auditor should highlight at the planning stage any additional work that is likely to be needed during the audit, including potential fee implications (although it may not be possible to quantify this until the work is done). Our […]

    Read more of: I have not agreed some of the proposed fees in the statement – why have you approved them?
  2. Why are the descriptions of some of the approved fee variations on my statement different to the information provided by my auditor?

    Our fee variation process uses a defined set of categories for our review of  fee variation proposals from auditors. This enables us to consider whether proposals relating to additional audit requirements, are proportionate and comparable. We use these categories in our fee variation statements to bodies. Auditors may, however, choose to use different terminology or […]

    Read more of: Why are the descriptions of some of the approved fee variations on my statement different to the information provided by my auditor?
  3. Why does the fee variation statement not include all the fee variations my auditor discussed with me?

    Where the statement does not include all fee variation proposals requested by your auditor, this may be because our review of some elements is not complete because we are waiting for further information. If we subsequently approve other fee variation proposals, we issue an updated statement.

    Read more of: Why does the fee variation statement not include all the fee variations my auditor discussed with me?
  4. If a body has received a modified audit opinion for a reason other than the backstop dates, will it receive the MHCLG funding?

    The £49 million funding announced by MHCLG in April 2025 is being provided to overhaul the local audit system and clear the audit backlog. MHCLG has stated that this funding is to cover the costs associated specifically for bodies to clear the backlog as part of the wider plan for change to the local audit […]

    Read more of: If a body has received a modified audit opinion for a reason other than the backstop dates, will it receive the MHCLG funding?
  5. Is the Government providing funding to address the local audit backlog?

    In April 2025 MHCLG announced 16 new commitments for local audit reform following an open consultation, including simplifying financial reporting requirements and increasing capacity to avoid reliance on a small number of auditors. The reforms are backed by £49 million to help bodies clear their backlogs and restore audit assurance, to be paid in two […]

    Read more of: Is the Government providing funding to address the local audit backlog?
  6. Why do audit firms use the same auditing standards as the private sector on public bodies?

    The Code of Audit Practice (COAP) sets out what local auditors of relevant local public bodies are required to do to fulfil their statutory responsibilities under the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014.  Local auditors must comply with the COAP. Para 2.6 requires auditors to apply the extant auditing standards set for the UK by the […]

    Read more of: Why do audit firms use the same auditing standards as the private sector on public bodies?
  7. Why is there an additional fee for ISA (UK) 315 (2022/23 and 2023/24 audits only)?

    Fees for new recurring audit requirements are only consolidated into the scale fee once we have sufficiently reliable information on the level of ongoing audit work needed. The audit work for ISA (UK) 315 (risks of material misstatement) and linked work on ISA (UK) 240 (fraud) has been included in the 2024/25 scale fees, but […]

    Read more of: Why is there an additional fee for ISA (UK) 315 (2022/23 and 2023/24 audits only)?
  8. Why is the additional fee for the VFM arrangements commentary higher than in previous years?

    Work on VFM arrangements comprises two elements: The VFM arrangements commentary fee variation in the statement may be higher than determined for other audit years because it includes the scale fee element for core VFM work. For bodies where the auditor has only completed the VFM arrangements work and the work to issue a disclaimer […]

    Read more of: Why is the additional fee for the VFM arrangements commentary higher than in previous years?
  9. Why is PSAA issuing interim fee variation statements which do not cover all relevant years?

    The proximity of the backstop dates for the up to 2022/23 and 2023/24 audits means that we are receiving fee variation proposals for over 700 audits in a short period. We expect it will take us several months to process all fee variations and we are working to ensure we do so thoroughly, effectively and […]

    Read more of: Why is PSAA issuing interim fee variation statements which do not cover all relevant years?
  10. Why are the disclaimer fees ‘TBC’ on the fee variation statements?

    In April 2025 MHCLG announced reforms to the local audit system backed by £49 million to help bodies clear their backlogs and restore audit assurance. The arrangements for distribution of this funding are due to be confirmed soon. We have chosen not to determine fee variations related to the issuing of a disclaimed opinion until […]

    Read more of: Why are the disclaimer fees ‘TBC’ on the fee variation statements?